Everybody should not feel no pain. Nobody could understand the previous statement, without reading it again. However, the medical text books are full of such. Not and no go away making the sentence this way: nobody should feel pain. What a bit of a twist to reach the conclusion. Still, it just took few seconds, but for me it took a long 7 years. (I bid most of you go to read the first sentence again)
I’m lost in drafts. There is a lot to speak of. In same time, there’s more to learn about. Sometimes, speaking a lot my compromise your learning time. Imam Ali says: “Who talks a lot, mistaken a lot.” Therefore, I’m obligated to tell you there is nothing important to gain in the next lines. It could be just more mistakes. Maybe, this entry will be completely line-less.
In general, doing mistakes is a troublesome, specially, when you are trusted on lives. Medical approach in general is very cautious. And it becomes more alert when you consider side effects of medications. No need to mention, death could be a side effect. This is very ironic; it could be restated to be: “death is a side effect of living!” Forget about this as I don’t want to fall in the trap of cancer and its misery. So here is the formula; more conservative treating approach, less mistakes. Nonetheless, I could notice that I’m very aggressive healer.
I have to apology, last week entry was very long. I don’t wish to make this one as the previous one. I am digressing from my main stream to introduce you to the digression. Noticeably, AlMa’arri, a blind man from Syria/Iraq, was very skillful in this art. Yeah, English folk, diverting from the paragraph, article, or whole book main idea is an art and very crucial art, which as far as I know, couldn’t be utilized by Shakespeare. However, the blind Arabic philosopher could practice it, more than a thousand years ago, in his native language, and I’m here to practice it in English regardless the nonsense I write. Just one more idea of digression, Simpsons could be good example.
If I were a doctor in The Simpsons, it would be normal for my crazy treating approach in that wonderland. I treat very aggressively, aiming to minimize the pain and suffer. After 7 months, when I start my internship, this is going to be a big time problem with any supervisor doctor. Doctors, remember Freud was prescribing cocaine for his patients. Currently, he’s one of the most referred to and respected figures in medical schools. Don’t think that I plan to give cocaine or morphine, to make my patients feel no pain, nor I plan to be as great as Freud is. Nevertheless, I’m soft hearted, and it’s not easy for me to start with less effective medication to be in safe side, and wishing it may work. Doctors, as long as you can’t feel, don’t assume.
Freud assumption/theory/idea divides the brain into 3 functional apparatus: the id, ego, and super ego. What I fancy the most is the super ego, as mine is super inflated. Freud started initially his ideas on the conscious and unconscious parts of the brain, we always try to explain the later terms, like super-ego, according to the initial terms. Therefore super-ego is the conscious, and all I could provide as a definition is examples; morality, perfection, and control. Narcissism is one important pillar, beside the father/ideal model image, and social manners to form the super ego. Also, the confliction between the father image and Oedipus complex is like the interaction between the super-ego and id. However, why did we assume that the father image always wins? Indeed, being child and helpless is a good answer. The construction of such model is very strong and very hard to question. Still, it could be all just a medical mistake!
